REFLECTION IN ACTION
Walter Zschokke
1999
The persistent repetition of what appears to be the same procedure in a
physical or artistic activity or in one related to arts and crafts with
the intention of making a work more profound or refined, of attaining
movement or making a statement is not always easy in our fast-paced
time. With the exception of high-caliber sports that demands the
perfect coordination of movements and a certain feel artistic work
might involve
a preoccupation with issues and tasks that are looked down upon by
mainstream cultural industry as obsolete and brushed aside without much
further ado.
The modernist fallacy that something new must replace anything else
that preceded it is widespread and has meanwhile come to resemble an
automatism
that leads to thoughtless destruction in the everyday
struggle of suppression. With recurring regularity
one or the other art form or art trend is declared dead.
Such a proclamation usually has to do with pure ideology or concealed
wishful thinking. On closer scrutiny,
the processes of cultural history show that something new initially
joins something already existing. Subsequently, a more protracted
practice unbiased toward the one or other would lead to insights
informing
on how further development, continuity and coexistence could relate in
a meaningful way.
The concrete artist Fritz Ruprechter has spent several years working
with a creative technique that allows him to systematically explore
options, limits and
transgressions on a formal and technical level, leaving diverse
pictorial effects to a certain feel and intuition and a deliberately
used element of chance. In his re
flective way he always changes one single parameter in extensive
working steps and studies the new effects
in a number of works, often numerous ones. With this intense reflection
in action (one could also refer to it
as a systematic exercise) he is able to gather new experiences and
insights that become more concrete when most subtly differentiated in
the following works and condensed in paintings.
His approach consists of making slanted marks in various density and
frequency on long stripes of surface material, cutting these stripes
into narrower ones and then arranging them in a haphazard way.
The vertical arrangement results in a columnlike structuring of the
total image, analogous to the linelike structure in a horizontal
arrangement. The added
stripes appear to convey unknown codes that optically integrate with
those on the stripe, or the adjacent
stripe, producing overlappings and interferences.
Since no one, even not he himself, can be familiar with these codes,
since they are born of the principle of
chance, the beholder is confronted with a pictorial total effect that
resembles that of the calligraphies of foreign cultures or, for
example, the quipu of the Incas. We
project wideranging connections but we do not know their meaning that
remains hidden even to the artist. This aspect of intended openness
that immediately draws the beholder into the picture is a crucial
element of Fritz Ruprechter's Ouvre.
For his works he uses mainly everyday, even 'cheap' materials that do
not cost much. For a long time he
worked with commercially available sandpaper with different grains and
various types of paint for 'priming'.
He produced the stripe-like markings by means of
extremely thin sheets of metal whose oxidation process was integrated
into the pictorial effect.
More recently, he has been using widely available types of paper:
packaging paper, drawing cardboard in various colors and tissue paper.
The slanted markings have become more sparse, giving way to a colorless
wax with which he covers the whole surface of the paper; when heated
the wax briefly changes its aggregate state. A material alienation
entails when processes of chance allow the liquid wax to melt,
penetrate the paper parts of which are scorched with a hot iron. Thus
the basic texture is overlapped with a process of transformation and
aging which also freezes once the processing ends.
The surfaces of the paintings appear to be segments without a margin.
The slanted markings fall into a struc ture based on contrast,
placement and proximity
to groups, figures and sequences whose coherency and context is
fleeting. Similar to tilting figures, there are various ways of reading
them, depending on what the beholder proceeds from. The markings in,
on, or in front of the constantly changing ground resemble stripes,
slits or even blows as evidenced by the contingent scar pattern that
emerges. This, once again, is indicative
of the processual nature of their realization.
The spatial impact of these paintings that can hardly be overlooked, in
particular of the large formats, is intended. In strongly defined
architectural settings, such as the Wittgensteinhaus in Vienna or the
gallery of the Austrian cultural institute in Prague, Ruprechter
adapted the proportion and format of his works to given window openings
or niches. Nevertheless, these paintings do
not so much resemble a window with a view as a luminous shield that
creates a spatial intensity through a
sort of emanation in the zone in front of it.
A second way of reading them is that they allow us to divine a
spiritual space beyond the curtain-like veil of the surface of the
painting in a sort of virtual transparence.
A mental penetration of the many semantic layers of
the picture surface leads us into an unknown era: past? - future? -
permanent presence? The strangely, semitransparent veil of the surface
sort of conceals a reflexive layer in front of an alleged space deep
below where the beholders might see their souls or present state reflected. With such intense intuition the basic technique,
the aimless reflection in action, in the practical exercise of creating
the painting, is conveyed and transferred.
This results in structural affinities to Japanese art and cultural
practices that Fritz Ruprechter knows from his own intuition and local
experience: arching (Kyudo),
calligraphy (Shodo) or other slightly refined everyday activities. His
paintings thus invite us to pause, to relax, to draw new strength and
compensation.
In some of his works one can note a certain reserve. These paintings
evade quick optical perception by
being illuminated or darkened. The contents are sublimated in this way
and the beholder is asked to become more immersed in the paintings and
to experience
their lasting effect. In this sense each painting reveals longer
intervals from the process of approximation and selfanalysis undergone
by the artist. In its intensity,
the artwork becomes a source of power that gives off energy when it is
looked at and also recharges itself.